Server-Side Monitoring vs. Pixel Monitoring - Which is Better?
A variety of e-commerce companies are turning to server-side tracking as a method to enhance their information collection procedures. While it calls for more technical knowledge than regular GTM and may introduce extra expenses, it can cause better precision and even more dependable data
Pixel monitoring makes use of an item of code to sign up conversions on your site. It's easy to set up and much less vulnerable to advertisement blockers.
1. A lot more accurate data
The traditional approach of tracking conversions on a web site, utilizing pixels, is having problem with changing browser personal privacy plans. This implies that the data being sent out to Google Advertisements, Facebook Business Manager and other systems is much less precise than it should be.
Server-side monitoring is an extra protected option that helps to bypass these constraints, as it's packed from your own domain name and dealt with as first-party code, implying it's less most likely to be impacted by ad blockers or various other safety steps. This provides extra precise data and an extra total picture of customer journeys across networks.
Furthermore, this type of monitoring enables businesses to track conversions beyond the site, such as phone calls and in-store sees, which can be challenging for pixel-based tracking. This versatility gives marketing experts a lot more ownership over the information they send, and makes it less complicated to adhere to various information laws. It's additionally a lot much less vulnerable to fraudulence, as it's more difficult for fraudulent actors to manipulate the system by changing the postback URL.
2. Much better control over data.
Server-side monitoring allows services to collect and enhance data before sending it to third-party analytics/advertising systems. This enhances information completeness and precision, which can help marketing experts make more enlightened marketing choices.
Traditional pixel tracking relies upon JavaScript tracking codes that are put in internet site visitors' internet browsers. These tracking codes are frequently obstructed by advertisement blockers, which can lead to information collection interruptions and unreliable outcomes. Server-side tracking makes it possible for businesses to bypass these restrictions and give accurate, constant information that is less prone to disturbance.
This type of monitoring additionally allows services to track conversions that happen outside of the site, like call and in-store purchases. This is very important given that new privacy plans such as Apple's Intelligent Monitoring Prevention (ITP) limit the life span of cookie-based monitoring pixels to 7 days. This is a key reason S2S is extra reliable for companies looking for to adjust to these changes.
3. Less susceptible to fraudulence
Server-side monitoring enables companies to control information hauls before it reaches 3rd party endpoints, boosting security and privacy. This is particularly crucial as various internet browsers and platforms increasingly alter exactly how they manage cookies. As an example, in iphone 14, Safari will only deliver first-party cookie data and will not enable pixel-based monitoring. Making use of server-side monitoring, you can bypass these constraints and remain to track conversions that happened outside of your site.
Additionally, server-side monitoring allows you to catch customer information straight by yourself web servers. This removes dependancy on 3rd parties, which can be prone to breaches and privacy violations.
A server-side tracking system is a set of instructions that tells your website's server what events to record. This data is then sent to analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Business. It's also used to trigger event-based advertisements, such as retargeting. On the other hand, pixel monitoring is a different approach that makes use of a tiny item of code on your web page to gather information from individuals.
4. Simpler to execute
Server-side tracking is a data collection process that takes place on the internet site's very own web server, bypassing internet browser restrictions. This implies that data collected by the website/app is first sent out to the web server where it's refined and after that forwarded to analytics tools like Google Analytics or Facebook Pixel.
The advantage of this strategy is that it lowers the range of data management and gives companies extra control first-touch attribution over transmission, making it normally a lot more reliable. Consequently, it's less vulnerable to information difficulties caused by things like a busted link or an active ad blocker being mounted.
With OWOX BI's Server-Side Monitoring, your company can collect real-time conversion information similarly that you would with pixels or a cookie, but this is after that passed directly to your marketing and advertising devices on the web server. This enables you to have more exact data and helps make certain conformity with privacy regulations such as GDPR. In addition, it likewise avoids the monitoring restrictions imposed by internet browsers and ad blockers.